Five Minute Review: Bird by Bird
by
William Womack, June 30th, 2008
It’s been a while since I read Anne Lamott’s Bird by Bird. So long, in fact, that when I decided to review it here, I had to pull it down from the shelf to reacquaint myself with it first. Skimming, I noted the chapter names and tried to recall what I had learned from each. Then I dove into one at random, and before I knew it an hour had vanished. This is maybe the best thing anyone can say about a book: I just kept reading.
If you’ve just begun your voyage as a writer, you might find yourself overwhelmed at the piles of books on writing. Grammar manuals, style guides, treatises on character development… it’s enough to make anyone wail but where do I start? Save yourself some agony and get your head right at the beginning: read Bird by Bird. In one short book, Ms. Lamott has created a doorway of sorts, an introduction that may just set you on the proper path to a lifetime of writing bliss. The subtitle says it all; Some Instructions on Writing and Life.
A really catchy movie line can winnow its way into the popular culture in no time, popping up at parties until you’re pretty sure you’ll grab a cocktail fork and murder the next person who says “show me the money” or advises you that “you can’t HANDLE the truth.” Hang out with writers who have read Lamott, and I guarantee you you’ll find her fingerprints all over their speech. “I know, it’s rough, but it’s just a shitty first draft,” one might say. “Remember to use your one-inch frame,” spouts another. Everyone nods in agreement. It’s a testament to how beautifully the author has wrapped up some of the messier, thornier issues writers face, and presented them with neat little bows.
The very first thing I tell my new students on the first day of a workshop is that good writing is about telling the truth. We are a species that needs and wants to understand who we are. Sheep lice do not seem to share this longing, which is one reason they write so very little. But we do. We have so much we want to say and figure out. Year after year my students are bursting with stories to tell, and they start writing projects with excitement and maybe even joy—finally their voices will be heard, and they are going to get to devote themselves to this one thing they’ve longed to do since childhood. But after a few days at the desk, telling the truth in an interesting way turns out to be about as easy and pleasurable as bathing a cat.
Anne Lamott is the writing teacher I wish I’d had as a kid. Maybe by now I would be polishing my Pulitzer, or moving aside my National Book Award to dust. As it is, I’m content to bathe myself in her weird, neurotic, often self-effacing wit, while finding these stunning little gems of absolute truth in her words. Yes, writing is hard. She doesn’t make any bones about that, to her credit. What she does is present the reader with a reasonable frame of reference for beginning a writing journey anyway, hard times be damned. It was she who first gave me permission to write poorly—to celebrate it, even—as a means of just getting the blighted words down on a page. She counsels keeping it simple, holding to short assignments (writing only what you can see through a one-inch picture frame), while pedaling furiously to keep ahead of the censors living in our heads.
In a progression of chapters that each read like fully-realized essays, she delves into the standards you’ll find in other books, such as character development and plot. But she’s not shy about dipping a toe in waters that others are too squeamish to mention; morality in storytelling (no, it’s not what you think), the salvation found in false starts, and how to know when you’re done.
Then I look into my students’ faces, and they look solemnly back at me.
“Who why does our writing matter, again?” they ask.
Because of the spirit, I say. Because of the heart. Writing and reading decrease our sense of isolation. They deepen and widen and expand our sense of life: they feed the soul.
This is no book of rules. Instead, it provides a sturdy foundation in the soft, shifting ground that underpins many of us and our desire to write.
| 3.0 |


I don’t remember exact context, but I like the part where she talks about drinking warm gin out of the cat dish. I’m fairly certain it has something important to do with the writing life.
Thank you for reminding me of a book that has been sitting on my shelf! I started it yesterday, and appreciate the idea of “small assignments”, and having a regular, daily time to write. She is funny when she talks about how we find every possible distraction and excuse to keep us from getting started.
@Tricia - she’s a stone cold freak at times; one of the reasons I enjoyed the book so much.
@Cassy - So true, isn’t it? I’m continually amazed at the love-hate writers have with their craft. Makes me wonder if stone masons go out of their way to avoid picking up chisels.
Just to clarify, I keep my gin in the freezer; drinking warm gin would be low class.
I really like the sound of this book - must add it to my wishlist for when I get some spare money. (Excuses, excuses, always excuses not to start writing or even to read about writing… Except blogs, anyway.)
Man, I think I’ve accidentally joined the “Womack Book of the Month Club!”
Elizabeth Lyon’s “A Writer’s Guide to Fiction” was interesting, but didn’t really give me sparks. The one piece of advice that sticks with me most: Her criticism that in most manuscripts the protagonist is the last character to be clearly developed.
Lamott’s book, on the other hand, really delivered for me. She presents her topics so succinctly — and in a voice that’s a breeze to read. The “shitty first draft,” in particular, is a great concept to keep in mind.
It’s interesting to notice what she *doesn’t* cover, too… There’s not a word in this book devoted establishing conflict or working out your plot in advance. I get the sense that Lamott’s a very intuitive writer, like Natalie Goldberg, who is so dedicated to the process of writing that she’s able to produce novels through sheer force of will…
I can’t help but suspect, though, that if she balanced out her passion for characters with a little more plot planning, writing wouldn’t be quite as chaotic an experience as she describes.
The more books I read on writing, the more I’m getting a sense that there’s a chasm in the community of writers between those who let their characters dictate the course of the novel — and writers for whom plot planning comes first, who would never write page one until they know how the story’s going to end.
I’m sure many if not most writers appreciate a balance — of both giving characters some free reign and doing some mapping out of where the story’s going to go… But maybe you can tell me: Am I onto something here? When you go to writers’ conferences and the like, do you perceive a tension lurking beneath the surface between these two personality types? –The improvising character-based novelist and the planning plot-based novelist?
…Anyway, thanks for another fine recommendation. Keep ‘em coming!